page 17: Gravitation and quantum theory—in the beginning
Table of contents
17.1: The story so far
17.2: Dinosaurs, birds and Newton's General Scholium
17.3: Einstein's rejection of quantum field theory
17.4: The modern problem with gravitation
17.5: The quantum origin of Minkowksi space
17.6: The simple relationship between gravitation and quantum theory
17.7: Gravitation and the creative power of measurement
17.8: Mathematics in mind and reality
17.1: The story so far
On pages 5 to 7 I have outlined two models for the creation of the world. Page 5: God's ideas, cybernetics and singularity, recounts the traditional Hebrew and Christian story taken from the Book of Genesis. Here we meet an eternal, omniscient and omnipotent creator who brings the world to into being by an act of will (let there be, fiat) according to a preordained plan. In their Christian incarnation this creator subsequently remains in control of every event in the new world at every moment, past, present and future. Aquinas, Summa, I, 22, 3: Does God have immediate providence over everything?
The second model, proposed here, starts from what is formally the same point, a structureless initial singularity of pure action, identical to the Christian God of Aquinas. Unlike the the traditional model, we invoke the modern understanding of communication and control, cybernetics, to replace the preordained deterministic action of a omniscient creator with an evolutionary process which proceeds by variation and selection. This process is analogous to the divine activity manifested in the Trinity: page 8: The theology of the Trinity.
Thomas Aquinas, Summa, I, 2, 3: Does God exist?, Cybernetics - Wikipedia
I imagine that this Universe emerges within the creator like the persons of the Trinity, not outside. This system has the same omnipotence as the traditional creator, the ability to do anything that does not involve contradiction. Since it is absolutely simple like the traditional God, however, it has no facility to represent information, and cannot therefore be omniscient or work to a pre-existing plan. It begins without structure and creates itself by random action and natural selection controlled by consistency. The Universe that emerges within this creator is the physical divine mind. This God begins with an empty mind and becomes aware of itself as it emerges within the singularity. This is analogous to the development of a child from egg to embryo to newborn. Aquinas, Summa I, 25, 3: Is God omnipotent?, Aquinas, Summa I, 14, 8: Is the knowledge of God the cause of things?, Rolf Landauer (1999): Information is a Physical Entity
The initial singularity is structureless, the initial symmetry, completely undifferentiated. Like the traditional omnipotent God, they can do anything that does not create contradictions. Like the Father of the Trinity, they can produce an identical copy of themself within themself as the Father produces the Son. A consequence of this action is the creation of space. Space we understand to be the state that enables two identical entities to exist and act independently of one another.
The children of god share the omnipotent power of god. The second person of the divinity can therefore reproduce themself to produce a third. The Christian dogma of the Trinity constrains the multiplication of divine personalities to three. Here we place no limit on this process and assume that the set of divine persons can grow to the cardinal of the set of natural numbers which Georg Cantor called by the first letter of the Hebrew alphabet, ℵ0.
With this primordial act of creation in mind, we now turn to connecting it to the familiar physical Universe in which we live. Between pages 9: The active creation of Hilbert space and page 15: Quantum amplitudes and logical processes are invisible we describe the quantum mechanical or kinematic phase of this process by which the the world we know differentiates formally within initial singularity. This kinema is driven by the omnipotence of the personalities emerging within the singularity.
On page 16: Potential + kinetic = zero energy universe I explain the assumption that the the initial singularity (and therefore the emergent universe as a whole) begins without energy. Here we are trying to imagine a quantum mechanical picture of creation in contrast to the standard big bang theory that seems to imagine that all the energy of the Universe was concentrated in an initial singularity which exploded to give us the world we live in. Stephen Hawking (2002): What's the Total Energy In the Universe?, Zero-energy universe - Wikipedia, Big Bang - Wikipedia.
Traditional theology is a creation of ancient poets and mystics, people who emerged at the dawn of humanity trying to understand the world in which they found themselves. Tens of thousands of years later modern physics and cosmology have produced another story of the nature of the world, the Standard Model. I like the idea implicit in the Standard Model that the Universe creates itself from an initial singularity. To me this means that the Universe is divine and that physics and theology are therefore talking about the same thing. If we are to really have a theory of everything it must combine both these disciplines. At present the standard model is principally confined to describing elementary particles. Standard model - Wikipedia
In the few centuries since Galileo with his telescope showed that the Catholic Church was wrong to insist that the Sun revolves around the Earth, physics has revealed much of the nature of the world to us and brought immense changes to many human lives. On the one hand we have almost free communication throughout the planet through the internet. On the other we have nuclear weapons, intense and violent conflicts about resources, massive population growth and a rate of consumption that is endangering the planet itself. Scientific success has brought us wonderful treasures. Our problems arise because this development has left theology and religion far behind. We need a new vision of divinity to guide us.
The era of modern technology began when Max Planck got his first glimpse of the quantum of action in 1900. Since then quantum theory has totally changed physics. In the early days Albert Einstein made significant contributions to the new theory. He introduced the most radical idea of all, that light behaves like both a wave and a particle. Laster he became disaffected with the new theory because the world it describes is no longer deterministic but somewhat random and creative. Einstein felt sure that God does not play dice. Albert Einstein (1905c): On a heuristic point of view concerning the production and transformation of light
The internet has two theoretical foundations. The first, reaching back to the world of the first telephones, is the mathematical theory of communication introduced by Claude Shannon. Shannon discovered that we can defeat communication error with quantization. This theory is based on the mathematical theory of probability. For more details see page 11: Quantization: the mathematical theory of communication. Claude Shannon (1949): Communication in the Presence of Noise
The second is the theory of computation introduced by Alan Turing. Computers are now ubiquitous and some feel that they are approaching the power of human intelligence. From a communication point of view, their principal role is to enable the implementation of Shannon's ideas for defeating errors. We can now transmit gigabytes of information error free over noisy channels. The price we pay is delay over noisy channels. Computer - Wikipedia
Ancient theologies tell us that the Divinities revealed themselves to us through the authors of the immense body of sacred literature that we have inherited from the distant past. These ideas are encoded in texts based on material symbols like the letters on this page. In our divine Universe, material particles are the carriers of the vast amount physical information which reveals the mind of the emerging divinity from moment to moment. There is more about this on page 21: Matter and spirit. In this picture, every event, every human experience, everywhere and at every time, is the sacred word of God. Behind this ceaseless flow of visible divine of experience lies the quantum world which is our best explanation of the mind of god. This mind works in the same way as our minds, by processes similar to those described on page 7: Networks, brains and consciousness.
Since the beginning a principal role of physics in human affairs has been the design and construction of weapons. Quantum mechanics shows us how to build nuclear weapons, the absolute epitome of political masculinity, even though they are practically useless for rational war. The nuclear defeat of the Japanese empire led an enormous flow of cash into the physics industry. Following Galileo's example, hundreds of billions of dollars have been spend on immense microscopes designed to explore the subatomic structures of the Universe. The result has been the standard model which some of its proponents consider to be a theory of everything. Large Hadron Collider - Wikipedia, Michio Kaku (2021): The God Equation: The Quest for a Theory of Everything
We have learnt that all the interactions between the elementary particles of our Universe fall into four categories: the strong and weak interactions which describe the world of nuclear particles; electrodynamics which covers all electrical interactions; and gravitation. The first three categories are currently described by quantum field theory. This theory works well, although as Kuhlman points out, it is a bit of a mess, plagued with infinities and other problems. His conclusion headlines this site: page 1: Abstract.
Unfortunately quantum field theory appears to have come to a dead end when it met gravitation. Quantum field theory deals with the mathematical infinities that arise within it with a process called renormalization. Feynman, in his Nobel lecture, suggested that renormalization is just a means to sweep the inadequacies of quantum field theory under the rug. I agree. The infinities in the theory point to deficiencies in the theory, not to deficiencies in nature. Richard P. Feynman (1965): Nobel Lecture: The Development of the Space-Time View of Quantum Electrodynamics
The trouble with current attempts to produce a quantum field theory of gravitation is that they contain infinities that cannot be renormalized away. The general consensus seems to be that a whole new line of theory is required. Kaku (1998): Introduction to Superstrings and M-Theory
Here I propose that gravitation is a theological phenomenon which embraces both physics and theology. It lies even deeper in the structure of the Universe than quantum mechanics. It is the primordial revelation of divinity, absolutely structureless just like the traditional gods of Aristotle and Aquinas, pure act, actus purus. As with the divinity, we cannot say what it is, only what it is not. Unmoved mover - Wikipedia, Aquinas, Summa, I, 3, 7: Is God altogether simple?, Apophatic theology - Wikipedia
back to page 17: toc
17.2: Dinosaurs, birds and Newton's General Scholium
It is a wet and grey day and I am sitting in the garden watching the birds defy gravity. They are protected and propelled by feathers that date back to the age of dinosaurs. Like guided missiles, they swoop over the fence, feather their wings and land precisely on the clothes line. On the ground they scavenge for food. The Sun comes out briefly and feeds the grass with photons. Feather - Wikipedia
Gravitation has played a role in every feature of this landscape, from the anatomy and physiology of the birds to the shape of the trees, fences and houses, my posture on my chair and even the thermonuclear reactions that bring us the light from the Sun. Its principal power lies in the fact that its negative potential energy is the source of the positive dynamic energy from which the visible Universe is made. It takes energy to move away from the gravitational attraction of the Earth. This means that in a subtle sense, gravitation plays the role of the God in Newton's General Scholium, establishing the dynamics of the universe.
He wrote:
This most beautiful System of the Sun, Planets, and Comets, could only proceed from the counsel and dominion of an intelligent and powerful being. . . ..
And from his true dominion it follows that the true God is a Living, Intelligent, and Powerful Being; and, from his other perfections, that he is Supreme or most Perfect. He is Eternal and Infinite, Omnipotent and Omniscient; that is, his duration reaches from Eternity to Eternity; his presence from Infinity to Infinity; he governs all things, and knows all things that are or can be done. . . ..
God is the same God, always and everywhere. He is omnipresent, not virtually only, but also substantially; for virtue cannot subsist without substance. In him are all things contained and moved; yet neither affects the other: God suffers nothing from the motion of bodies; bodies find no resistance from the omnipresence of God. . . ..
God perceives and understands all things. He is utterly void of all body and bodily figure, and can therefore neither be seen, nor heard, not touched; . . .. We know him only by his most wise and excellent contrivances of things, and final causes; we admire him for his perfections; but we reverence and adore him on account of his dominion. Isaac Newton (1726): Philosophia Naturalis Principia Mathematica - General Scholium (1713)
Newton's Scholium paints a traditional picture of God. Here my story is quite different but our stories agree at one point. Newton writes He is omnipresent, not virtually only, but also substantially; for virtue cannot subsist without substance. Gravitation is in effect the substantial presence of divinity that brings possibility into reality. Gravitational potential is like money held by the universe "at call" to enable the realization of dynamic systems with positive energy. On this analogy the unit of value is the quantum of action. The conservation of energy is a consequence of the zero sum bifurcation of action into positive and negative energy which is closely related to the bifurcation of action into time and space associated with the creation of spacetime (see page 26: Principles embedded in this site: principle 2: Zero sum complexification) Bank - Wikipedia
I began this project with the work of Aristotle, written 2600 years ago. Aquinas synthesized science and theology in the Middle Ages when Aristotle was still the epitome of science. Galileo liberated science from Aristotle in the seventeenth century. Sixty years ago I discovered Aquinas and set out to repeat his achievement, to harmonize modern physics and traditional theology. Our modern understanding of gravitation and quantum theory have made this task more complex but much more fruitful.
Einstein's path to gravitation is described on page 16: Potential + kinetic = zero energy universe. We now turn to a more detailed description of the relationship between gravitation and quantum mechanics. This was established at the beginning of creation and serves to enable the evolution of the current Universe within the initial singularity.
back to page 17: toc
17.3: Einstein's rejection of quantum field theory
Einstein's enormous success with general relativity, coming on top of Faraday's ideas about magnetic field and Maxwell's field equations that provided an electromagnetic explanation of light seems to have convinced almost everyone that field theory is the key to physics.
The first major success was quantum electrodynamics, although it was plagued by the difficulties arising from the mathematical assumption that continuous fields have infinite degrees of freedom. This assumption overlooked Aristotle's notion that there are no real infinities. A mathematical antidote to the problem was the development of the mathematical technique of renormalization. Renormalization group - Wikipedia
An unfortunate personal side effect of Einstein's success with gravitation was that it blinded him to the reality of quantum theory and set him on the hopeless search for a unified theory based on the mathematical theory of fields. He explained his feeling in his 1933 Herbert Spencer Lecture:
It is essential for our point of view that we can arrive at these constructions and the laws relating them one with another by adhering to the principle of searching for the mathematically simplest concepts and their connections. In the paucity of the mathematically existent simple field-types and of the relations
between them, lies the justification for the theorist's hope that he may comprehend reality in its depths.
The modern quantum theory associated with the names of de Broglie, Schrödinger, and Dirac, which of course operates with continuous functions, has overcome this difficulty by means of a daring interpretation first given a clear form by Max Born: — the space functions that appear in the equation make no claim to be a mathematical model of atomic objects. These functions are only supposed to determine in a mathematical way the probabilities of encountering these objects in a particular place or in a particular state of motions, if we make a measurement. This process is logically unexceptionable, and has led to important successes. But unfortunately it forces us to employ a continuum of which the number of dimensions is not that of the previous physics, namely 4, but has dimensions increasing without limit as the number of particles constituting the system under examination increases. I cannot help confessing that I myself accord this interpretation no more than transitory significance. I believe in the possibility of giving a model of reality, a theory, that is to say, which shall represent events themselves and not merely the probability of their occurrence [my italics]. Albert Einstein (1933): On the Method of Theoretical Physics: Herbert Spencer Lecture 1933
back to page 17: toc
17.4: The modern problem with gravitation
The apparent success of quantum field theory in the explanation of electromagnetism, the weak force and the strong force has convinced many that it should be possible to develop a quantum theory of gravitation. The success with the first three fields depended on the invention of renormalization.
As Huang points out, infinities began to enter physics when Lorentz began thinking about what goes on inside an electron. He conceived the electron as a particle existing in spacetime whose "self mass" diverged linearly to infinity as its radius tended to zero, the first of many "ultraviolet catastrophes" that have plagued physics build on continuous mathematics. We may imagine that black holes are the most recent and realistic version of this problem. If the Universe started as a black hole, why did it not remain a black hole? We have a similar problem with antiparticles. Why did the Universe not annihilate itself in the beginning? Kerson Huang (2013): A Critical History of Renormalization
Renormalization saved quantum electrodynamics and the theory of the weak force and provided an explanation for confinement and asymptotic freedom in quantum chromodynamics. Feynman thought it was a bit dodgy, but was pleased that it worked. It does not work for gravitation, forcing us to look elsewhere. This problem arises because while the coupling constants associated with the interactions in the successful field theories are scalar representing phase, a pure (complex)number, gravitation is not. The other field theories work because, as Dirac discovered when he set out to introduce the Lagrangian to quantum theory, it became necessary to ignore four dimensional spacetime and deal only in phase, the currency of quantum mechanics, a function of a single variable. A key to field theory is gauge invariance which might also be called called phase invariance. The principal application of Hamiltonian mechanics in quantum physics is to use the calculus of variations discover fixed points of the Lagrangian function, that is fixed points in phase. Martinus J G Veltman (1999): Nobel Lecture 1999: From weak interactions to gravitation, Gravitational constant - Wikipedia, Paul A. M. Dirac (1933): The Lagrangian in Quantum Mechanics, Gauge theory - Wikipedia, Hamiltonian mechanics - Wikipedia
Newton's gravitational constant G that maps the interactions between masses (or equivalent energy) in 4-space has the physical dimensions M-1 L3 T-2. Because gravitation is unrenormalizable within standard quantum field theory, the search for quantization has led to an enormous amount of relatively unsuccessful physical and mathematical speculation about the fundamental structure of the Universe. Supersymmetry - Wikipedia, String theory - Wikipedia.
Quantum mechanics began with the electromagnetic interactions within atoms. The first step toward a quantum mechanical model of the atom was motivated by Balmer's discovery in 1885 of a simple mathematical relationship between the frequencies of some of the lines in the hydrogen spectrum. This led, via Planck's discovery of quantization, to the Bohr model of the atom and the eventual development of a comprehensive quantum theory documented by Dirac and von Neumann in the 1920s and 30s. Balmer series - Wikipedia, Paul Dirac (1983): The Principles of Quantum Mechanics, John von Neumann (2014): Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics
Efforts to produce a unified theory which combines quantized gravitation with the other three forces, strong, weak and electromagnetic have tended toward increasing formal complexity. It is difficult understand how a simple initial singularity could represent the increase in spatial dimensions and varieties of fundamental particles proposed by various candidate theories. One of the foundations of this essay, the heuristic of simplicity, is an attempt promote simple explanations of the simple initial states of the Universe: Principle 8: The heuristic of simplicity.
This has led me back to the beginning. The modern search for understanding gravitation seems to concentrate on the Planck scale, a realm of impossibly small size and extraordinarily high energy, far beyond anything we could ever hope to deal with experimentally. On the other hand gravitation applies at scales ranging from the initial singularity to the size of the Universe. At normal macroscopic scales it is some 40 orders of magnitude weaker than electromagnetism. Finally it is generically different from the other forces. Mass energy is both the source and the subject of gravitation unlike the strong, weak and electrical forces which are mediated by properties possessed by particles in addition to their energy content. Planck scale - Wikipedia
From my point of view, it seems obvious that there is no practical need for gravitation to be quantized since it seems to work perfectly in a continuous differentiable manifold. The only problem, which actually seems to be a cosmological feature, is its ability to create black holes. These massive accumulations of energy seem to be important in the structure of galaxies. Fabio Pacucci et al: JWST CEERS and JADES Active Galaxies at z = 4–7 Violate the Local M•–Må Relation at >3σ: Implications for Low-mass Black Holes and Seeding Models
Here we are confronted by the interface of the formalist world of mathematical perfection, where computations made with real numbers yield results of unlimited precision, and the noisy world of physical reality where precision is limited by noise and uncertainty. In this situation error can be controlled by quantization. Shannon's theory makes it possible to move gigabytes of information over noisy connections without error. Claude Shannon (1949): Communication in the Presence of Noise
Conversely, we should not expect to find quantization where error is impossible, that is in a regime where every possible message is a valid message. Since gravitation couples universally to energy alone, and is blind to the particular nature of the particles or fields associated with that energy, we can imagine that gravitation involves unconstrained and therefore intrinsically error free and non-quantized interaction, what we might call codeless communication. The introduction of a code immediately reduces the space of communication. The existence of thousands of local languages around the planet means that each of us is located in a space determined by the languages we know. Gravitation is the symmetry that lies beneath Babel. This symmetry is broken by the codecs of the three quantum mechanical languages of electrodynamics, the weak and strong forces. Tower of Babel - Wikipedia, Codec - Wikipedia
back to page 17: toc
17.5: The quantum origin of Minkowski space
As Einstein points out in the conclusion to his paper on the field equations of gravitation quoted above . . . the general relativity postulate offers nothing new about the essence of the other natural processes, which wasn't already taught by the special theory of relativity.
On page 12: The quantum creation of Minkowski space I suggest that much of the confusion in quantum field theory can be resolved by assuming that Hilbert space is prior to Minkowski space, so that Minkowski space is a product of quantum mechanics. Von Neumann's axiomatic definition of abstract Hilbert space is an ideal complex mathematical foundation for quantum mechanics. It seems to be generally accepted that the domain of this space is the Minkowski space defined by special relativity. In the picture developed here, however, Hilbert space is formally nowhere because we consider it to exist before the emergence of spacetime.
On page 9: The active creation of Hilbert space I describe the emergence of Hilbert space within the gravitational initial singularity by an application of fixed point theory. Different basis states of Hilbert space arise from different mappings of the initial singularity onto itself. We may imagine that these mappings may embrace all the ℵ0 turing computable functions. I assume that the initial singularity is a real dynamic system, and that the Hilbert space within it is a kinematic system operated by the dynamics of the singularity analogous to the way that formal mathematics is manipulated in our dynamics,in our computing machinery and in dynamic reality in general. We expect to find this structure in all the particulate children of the initial singularity. As computer generated imagery shows us, kinematic systems can perform actions that are forbidden to dynamics. It is for this reason that we assume that this unconstrained Hilbert space in the initial singularity is the source of the variation that enables the evolution of the physical universe.
Since this primordial Hilbert space exists prior to spacetime all of its basis vectors are naturally superposed and the complexity of the superposition grows as the Hilbert space grows.
On page 12: The quantum creation of Minkowski space I assume, without proposing an exact mechanism or algorithm, that there is sufficient variety in this primordial Hilbert space to lead to the emergence of a spacetime with the Minkowski metric. This spacetime, by enabling massless particles to travel along null geodesics which are effectively outside spacetime, enables the transport of quantum states through spacetime. An example of this facility is the transmission of quantum states from the early universe to contemporary observers through the photons of the cosmic background radiation. The other three dimensions of Minkowski space may be a product of the emergence of fermions which need three dimensions for free motion since, like all massive physical objects they obey an exclusion principle and are unable to occupy the same point in space-time. Cosmic microwave background - Wikipedia
Since we can imagine Einstein space as being constructed from tangential Minkowski spaces, it seems that the key to the relationship of quantum mechanics to gravitation run through Minkowski space, and I assume that connection here.
back to page 17: toc
17.6: The simple relationship between gravitation and quantum theory
The assumption that the total energy of the Universe is zero discussed on page page 16: Potential + kinetic = zero energy universe suggests a simple relationship between gravitation and quantum theory. We have assumed that the initial singularity is pure action, identical to the Thomistic God of the Roman Catholic Church. On page 9: The active creation of Hilbert space we described, by analogy to the divine self awareness underlying the processions in the Trinity, the emergence within the singularity of quantum basis states. We imagine that this may proceed far beyond the first two persons of the traditional Trinity to the cardinal of the natural numbers. We understand this space to be kinematic, in effect a puppet moved by the singularity which we understand to be a real dynamic entity like the traditional god of pure activity. Qubit - Wikipedia
We model the initial singularity mathematically as a set or space E whose topology comprises arbitrary unions of families of countable subsets and finite intersections of such sets. On this definition, both E and the empty set ∅ are complements of one another, and both may be considered as a superposition of open and closed sets. Insofar as E is continuous, convex and compact we may imagine that its mappings onto itself have fixed points which we understand to be basis states in the Hilbert space underlying quantum mechanics (page 10: The emergence of quantum mechanics). Sonnenschein & Green (1977): Elements of Complex Analysis, Brouwer fixed point theorem - Wikipedia
We attribute the role of gravitation to the continuous aspect of the initial singularity. We then assume that the kinematic eigenvalues that are selected by the Hermitian operators of quantum mechanics in this Hilbert space become dynamic particles by receiving energy from gravitation. This process marks the bifurcation of structureless "naked" gravitation into potential and kinetic energy. The negative potential in the gravitational field is equivalent to the positive energy of the particles. This is equivalent to the Universe "measuring" itself as described on page 14: "Measurement": the interface between Hilbert and Minkowski spaces. In this way we maintain the zero-energy status of the initial singularity while creating the first particles within it, maybe bosons and fermions, whose energy corresponds to the frequency of the selected eigenvalues in the newly forming Hilbert space. Rolf Landauer (1999): Information is a Physical Entity
We assume that this kinematic Hilbert space is in perpetual motion driven by the creative power of the initial singularity. Because the interior of the initial singularity is not extended in space and time we assume that all these basis vectors of the Hilbert space are superposed. We assume from the cybernetic principle of requisite variety that the initial symmetry has limited control over its behaviour so the creation of a Hilbert space within itself is a sequence of random events. At any particular stage in this creation process, these basis states comprise a complete system of events from a probabilistic point of view. Andrei Kolmogorov (1956): Foundations of the Theory of Probability
The complexity of an explanation, if it is true and sufficient, should be equivalent to the complexity of the system to be explained: the reality and the explanation should be connected by a reversible codec. Since we exist and we assume that nothing comes from nothing, the initial singularity, like the traditional divinity, simply exists and there is nothing more to be said about it. The possibility of explanation arises when the operation of the principle of zero sum complexification yields a duality. If we assume that both quantum mechanics and gravitation are primordial, we assume that they work together to create real particles. Energy, derived from gravitation, makes these kinematic eigenvectors into real dynamic particles. At the same time the transfer of energy to real particles deepens the gravitational potential well, contributing to the stability of the universe.
back to page 17: toc
17.7: Gravitation and the creative power of measurement.
We assume that the initial singularity is just a single state. According to Boltzmann's simple entropy equation S = k log W where W is a count of states, when W = 1, S, the entropy of the initial singularity, is zero. In its present state, however the entropy of the Universe is very large no matter how we count it. Increase in entropy is the simplest measure of creation. Boltzmann's entropy formula - Wikipedia
Von Neumann's treatment of quantum observation shows that observation increases entropy. For those who understand measurement as associated with "the collapse of the wave function" this may seem counterintuitive, since a measurement selects just one state out of a system believed to have many states. This is not the case with Zurek's explanation of measurement summarized on page 14: "Measurement": the interface between Hilbert and Minkowski spaces. Von Neumann's explanation of the increase in entropy associated with the Universe observing itself, gives us some insight into the cognitive nature of self awareness which leads us to understand ourselves and so increase our personal entropy as our experience of life grows. John von Neumann (2014): Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics chapter 5 sqq
back to page 17: toc
17.8: Mathematics in mind and reality
An important idea in this site is represented by the relationship between kinematics and dynamics which is analogous the relationships between ideas and reality; in physics between time and spacetime and in mathematics between real and complex numbers and in theology between matter and spirit.
We may say that kinematics models motion, as in the cinema, where we know that what we see on the screen is not really happening, but is being modelled by moving images created by cameras, artists or computers. As Einstein notes, the special theory of relativity is a kinematic theory. It tells us that the metric of spacetime is consistent with Maxwell's electrodynamics. Maxwell's theory is a classical representation of the dynamic spacetime processes within a photon of light, but we must introduce quantum mechanics and gravitation to obtain a suitable explanation of this coincidence. Albert Einstein (1905): On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies
Dynamics, on the other hand, seeks to explain the causes of motion. Newton explained the orbit of the moon in terms of centrifugal and gravitational forces. Einstein replaced Newton's story with a picture framed in terms of geodesic deviation described by a real spacetime metric derived from the interaction of energy with itself. At least on a large scale, the classical mathematical formalism of the differentiable manifold provides a precise model of observed reality. It is based on the special theory of relativity, which is classical and kinematic. It tells us how the world works, but does not explain why. Kinematics - Wikipedia, Dynamics - Wikipedia
Mathematics, as practised by users of mathematics, is kinematic. The symbols do not move themselves, the are moved mentally and physically by the users. When we read Turing's proof we have to imagine Turing's machine and manipulate its components in the manner described by Turing's algorithm. The result is a process that we understand to represent any possible computation. Turing then goes on to show that there are conclusions which the logically controlled deterministic processes he describes cannot reach, that is there are incomputable functions. There is no way to manipulate the machine to overcome this limitation.
Galileo set mathematical physics on its way by observing that mathematics is the language of nature:
Philosophy is written in this grand book - the universe, which stands continually open before our gaze. But the book cannot be understood unless one first learns to comprehend the language and to read the alphabet in which it is composed. It is written in the language of mathematics . . .. Galileo Galilei (1610, 1957) : Discoveries and Opinions of Galileo: Including the Starry Messenger, p 238.
Galileo's idea is now deeply embedded in modern physics. The only problem with Galileo's statement is that the Universe is not completely open before our gaze: much of what happens is invisible (page 15: Quantum amplitudes and logical processes are invisible. Philosophers may ask whether mathematics exists independently of mathematicians or whether we make it ourselves. Hilbert's formalist program suggests that we make it, a kinematic product of our dynamic minds.. Since we assume that the Universe begins with no structure at all, we must assume that the evolutionary process that creates the Universe, since it is capable of trying all possibilities and selecting those that work, creates mathematics and embodies it in the structure of the universe in the same way as it is created by the mathematical community and embodied in the minds and literature of mathematicians and users of mathematics such as engineers. Those discoveries that are interesting and logically consistent are admitted to the mathematical canon, but because they are kinematic, they are not necessarily guaranteed dynamic reality. Hilbert's program - Wikipedia
Organizations like the Clay Mathematics Institute are aware that the study of nature is a rich source of mathematical ideas so they promote cross fertilization between mathematics and physics by offering prize money to encourage work in this domain. Carlson, Jaffe & Wiles (2006): The Millennium Prize Problems; §7 Quantum Yang-Mills Theory
back to page 17: toc
(revised Saturday 1o August 2024)
Back to site toc
|
Copyright:
You may copy this material freely provided only that you quote fairly and provide a link (or reference) to your source.
Notes and references
Further readingBooks
Carlson (2006), James, and Arthur Jaffe & Andrew Wiles, The Millennium Prize Problems, Clay Mathematics Institute and American Mathematical Society 2006 1: The Birch and Swinnerton-Dyer Conjecture: Andrew Wiles
2: The Hodge Conjecture: Pierre Deligne
3: The Existence and Smoothness of the Navier-Stokes Equation: Charles L Fefferman
4: The Poincare Conjecture: John Milnor
5: The P versus NP Problem: Stephen Cook
6: The Riemann Hypothesis: Enrico Bombieri
7: Quantum Yang-Mills Theory: Arthur Jaffe and Edward Whitten
Amazon
back |
Dirac (1983), P A M, The Principles of Quantum Mechanics (4th ed), Oxford UP/Clarendon 1983 Jacket: '[this] is the standard work in the fundamental principles of quantum mechanics, indispensible both to the advanced student and the mature research worker, who will always find it a fresh source of knowledge and stimulation.' (Nature)
Amazon
back |
Einstein (1916, 2005), Albert, and Robert W Lawson (translator) Roger Penrose (Introduction), Robert Geroch (Commentary), David C Cassidy (Historical Essay), Relativity: The Special and General Theory, Pi Press 1916, 2005 Preface: 'The present book is intended, as far as possible, to give an exact insight into the theory of relativity to those readers who, from a general scientific and philosophical point of view, are interested in the theory, but who are not conversant with the mathematical apparatus of theoretical physics. ... The author has spared himself no pains in his endeavour to present the main ideas in the simplest and most intelligible form, and on the whole, in the sequence and connection in which they actually originated.' page 3
Amazon
back |
Galilei (1610, 1957), Galileo, and Stillman Drake (translator), Discoveries and Opinions of Galileo: Including the Starry Messenger (1610 Letter to the Grand Duchess Christina), Doubleday Anchor 1957 Amazon: 'Although the introductory sections are a bit dated, this book contains some of the best translations available of Galileo's works in English. It includes a broad range of his theories (both those we recognize as "correct" and those in which he was "in error"). Both types indicate his creativity. The reproductions of his sketches of the moons of Jupiter (in "The Starry Messenger") are accurate enough to match to modern computer programs which show the positions of the moons for any date in history. The appendix with a chronological summary of Galileo's life is very useful in placing the readings in context.' A Reader.
Amazon
back |
Kaku (1998), Michio, Introduction to Superstrings and M-Theory (Graduate Texts in Contemporary Physics), Springer 1998 ' Called by some "the theory of everything," superstrings may solve a problem which has eluded physicists for the past 50 years -- the final unification of the two great theories of the twentieth century, general relativity and quantum field theory. This is a course-tested comprehensive introductory graduate text on superstrings which stresses the most current areas of interest, not covered in other presentation, including: string field theory, multi loops, Teichmueller spaces, conformal field theory, and four-dimensional strings. The book begins with a simple discussion of point particle theory, and uses the Feynman path integral technique to unify the presentation of superstrings. Prerequisites are an acquaintance with quantum mechanics and relativity. This second edition has been revised and updated throughout.'
Amazon
back |
Kaku (2021), Michio, The God Equation: The Quest for a Theory of Everything, Doubleday 2021 ' This is the story of a quest: to find a Theory of Everything. Einstein dedicated his life to seeking this elusive Holy Grail, a single, revolutionary 'god equation' which would tie all the forces in the universe together, yet never found it. Some of the greatest minds in physics took up the search, from Stephen Hawking to Brian Greene. None have yet succeeded.
In The God Equation, renowned theoretical physicist Michio Kaku takes the reader on a mind-bending ride through the twists and turns of this epic journey: a mystery that has fascinated him for most of his life. He guides us through the key debates in modern physics, from Newton's law of gravity via relativity and quantum mechanics to the latest developments in string theory.
Amazon
back |
Kolmogorov (1956), Andrey Nikolaevich, and Nathan Morrison (Translator) (With an added bibliography by A T Bharucha-Reid), Foundations of the Theory of Probability, Chelsea 1956 Preface: 'The purpose of this monograph is to give an axiomatic foundation for the theory of probability. . . . This task would have been a rather hopeless one before the introduction of Lebesgue's theories of measure and integration. However, after Lebesgue's publication of his investigations, the analogies between measure of a set and mathematical expectation of a random variable became apparent. These analogies allowed of further extensions; thus, for example, various properties of independent random variables were seen to be in complete analogy with the corresponding properties of orthogonal functions . . .'
Amazon
back |
Nielsen (2016), Michael A., and Isaac L Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information, Cambridge University Press 2016 Review: A rigorous, comprehensive text on quantum information is timely. The study of quantum information and computation represents a particularly direct route to understanding quantum mechanics. Unlike the traditional route to quantum mechanics via Schroedinger's equation and the hydrogen atom, the study of quantum information requires no calculus, merely a knowledge of complex numbers and matrix multiplication. In addition, quantum information processing gives direct access to the traditionally advanced topics of measurement of quantum systems and decoherence.' Seth Lloyd, Department of Quantum Mechanical Engineering, MIT, Nature 6876: vol 416 page 19, 7 March 2002.
Amazon
back |
Sonnenschein (1977), Jacob, and Simon Green, Elements of Complex Analysis, Dickenson 1977 ' Preface: This book is the result of lectures given by Prof. Dr. J. Sonnenschein at the Brussels University. It is an introductory course in complex analysis of one complex variable. It contains sufficient material for about thirty lectures.
The aim pf the book is to introduce the principal notions an theorems of complex analysis and to make the reader acquainted as quickly as possible and with as much rigor as can be obtained in a short course, with the knowledge necessary to use the most important results of complex analysis in pure and applied mathematics.'
Amazon
back |
Links
Albert Einstein (1905), On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies, ' It is well known that Maxwell's electrodynamics-as usually understood at present—when applied to moving bodies, leads to asymmetries that do not seem to attach to the phenomena. Let us recall, for example, the electro-dynamic interaction between a magnet and a conductor. The observable phenomenon depends here only on the relative motion of conductor and magnet, while according to the customary conception the two cases, in which, respectively, either the one or the other of the two bodies is the one in motion, are to be strictly differentiated from each other. For if the magnet is in motion and the conductor is at rest, there arises in the surroundings of the magnet an electric field endowed with a certain energy value that produces a current in the places where parts of the conductor are located. But if the magnet is at rest and the conductor is in motion, no electric field arises in the surroundings of the magnet, while in the conductor an electromotive force will arise, to which in itself there does not correspond any energy, but which, provided that the relative motion in the two cases considered is the same, gives rise to electrical currents that have the same magnitude and the same course as those produced by the electric forces in the first-mentioned case.' back |
Albert Einstein (1905c), On a heuristic point of view concerning the production and transformation of light, ' The wave theory of light, which operates with continuous spatial functions, has proved itself splendidly in describing purely optical phenomena and will probably never be replaced by another theory. One should keep in mind, however, that optical observations apply to time averages and not to momentary values, and it is conceivable that despite the complete confirmation of the theories of diffraction, reflection, refraction, dispersion, etc., by experiment, the theory of light, which operates with continuous spatial functions, may lead to contradictions with experience when it is applied to the phenomena of production and transformation of light.
Indeed, it seems to me that the observations regarding "black-body" light, and other groups of phenomena associated with the production or conversion of light can be understood better if one assumes that the energy of light is discontinuously distributed in space.' back |
Albert Einstein (1915, 2010), The Field Equations of Gravitation (Translation), ' By that, the general theory of relativity as a logical building is eventually finished. The relativity postulate in its general form that makes the space-time coordinates to physically meaningless parameters, is directed with stringent necessity to a very specific theory of gravitation that explains the perihelion motion of mercury. However, the general relativity postulate offers nothing new about the essence of the other natural processes, which wasn't already taught by the special theory of relativity.' back |
Albert Einstein (1933), On the Method of Theoretical Physics: Herbert Spencer Lecture 1933, ' It can scarcely be denied that the supreme goal of all theory is to make the irreducible basic elements as simple and as few as possible without having to surrender the adequate representation of a single datum of experience. back |
Apophatic theology - Wikipedia, Apophatic theology - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, 'Apophatic theology (from Greek ἀπόφασις from ἀπόφημι - apophēmi, "to deny")—also known as negative theology or via negativa (Latin for "negative way")—is a theology that attempts to describe God, the Divine Good, by negation, to speak only in terms of what may not be said about the perfect goodness that is God. It stands in contrast with cataphatic theology.' back |
Aquinas, Summa I, 14, 8, Is the knowledge of God the cause of things?, 'I answer that, The knowledge of God is the cause of things. For the knowledge of God is to all creatures what the knowledge of the artificer is to things made by his art. . . . Now it is manifest that God causes things by His intellect, since His being is His act of understanding; and hence His knowledge must be the cause of things, in so far as His will is joined to it. Hence the knowledge of God as the cause of things is usually called the "knowledge of approbation." ' back |
Aquinas, Summa I, 25, 3, Is God omnipotent?, '. . . God is called omnipotent because He can do all things that are possible absolutely; which is the second way of saying a thing is possible. For a thing is said to be possible or impossible absolutely, according to the relation in which the very terms stand to one another, possible if the predicate is not incompatible with the subject, as that Socrates sits; and absolutely impossible when the predicate is altogether incompatible with the subject, as, for instance, that a man is a donkey.' back |
Aquinas, Summa, I, 22, 3, Does God have immediate providence over everything?, ' I answer that, Two things belong to providence—namely, the type of the order of things foreordained towards an end; and the execution of this order, which is called government. As regards the first of these, God has immediate providence over everything, because He has in His intellect the types of everything, even the smallest; and whatsoever causes He assigns to certain effects, He gives them the power to produce those effects. Whence it must be that He has beforehand the type of those effects in His mind. As to the second, there are certain intermediaries of God's providence; for He governs things inferior by superior, not on account of any defect in His power, but by reason of the abundance of His goodness; so that the dignity of causality is imparted even to creatures.' back |
Aquinas, Summa, I, 3, 7, Is God altogether simple?, 'I answer that, The absolute simplicity of God may be shown in many ways.
First, from the previous articles of this question. For there is neither composition of quantitative parts in God, since He is not a body; nor composition of matter and form; nor does His nature differ from His "suppositum"; nor His essence from His existence; neither is there in Him composition of genus and difference, nor of subject and accident. Therefore, it is clear that God is nowise composite, but is altogether simple. . . . ' back |
Aquinas, Summa: I, 14, 1, Is there knowledge in God?, ' I answer that, In God there exists the most perfect knowledge. . . . it is clear that the immateriality of a thing is the reason why it is cognitive; and according to the mode of immateriality is the mode of knowledge. Hence it is said in De Anima ii that plants do not know, because they are wholly material. But sense is cognitive because it can receive images free from matter, and the intellect is still further cognitive, because it is more separated from matter and unmixed, as said in De Anima iii. Since therefore God is in the highest degree of immateriality as stated above (Question 7, Article 1), it follows that He occupies the highest place in knowledge.' back |
Aquinas, Summa: I, 2, 3, Does God exist?, 'I answer that, The existence of God can be proved in five ways. The first and more manifest way is the argument from motion. . . . ' back |
Balmer series - Wikipedia, Balmer series - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, ' The Balmer series is characterized by the electron transitioning from n ≥ 3 to n = 2, where n refers to the radial quantum number or principal quantum number of the electron. The transitions are named sequentially by Greek letter: n = 3 to n = 2 is called H-α, 4 to 2 is H-β, 5 to 2 is H-γ, and 6 to 2 is H-δ. As the first spectral lines associated with this series are located in the visible part of the electromagnetic spectrum, these lines are historically referred to as "H-alpha", "H-beta", "H-gamma", and so on, where H is the element hydrogen.' back |
Bank - Wikipedia, Bank - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, A bank is a financial institution that accepts deposits from the public and creates a demand deposit while simultaneously making loans.[1] Lending activities can be directly performed by the bank or indirectly through capital markets. . . . Banking in its modern sense evolved in the fourteenth century in the prosperous cities of Renaissance Italy but in many ways functioned as a continuation of ideas and concepts of credit and lending that had their roots in the ancient world.' back |
Big Bang - Wikipedia, Big Bang - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, ' The Big Bang theory is the prevailing cosmological model explaining the existence of the observable universe from the earliest known periods through its subsequent large-scale evolution. The model describes how the universe expanded from an initial state of high density and temperature, and offers a comprehensive explanation for a broad range of observed phenomena, including the abundance of light elements, the cosmic microwave background (CMB) radiation, and large-scale structure. ' back |
Boltzmann's entropy formula - Wikipedia, Boltzmann's entropy formula - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, 'In statistical mechanics, Boltzmann's equation is a probability equation relating the entropy S of an ideal gas to the quantity W, which is the number of microstates corresponding to a given macrostate:
S = k ln W
where k is the Boltzmann constant, . . . which is equal to 1.38062 x 10−23 J/K. back |
Brouwer fixed point theorem - Wikipedia, Brouwer fixed point theorem - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, 'Among hundreds of fixed-point theorems] Brouwer's is particularly well known, due in part to its use across numerous fields of mathematics. In its original field, this result is one of the key theorems characterizing the topology of Euclidean spaces, along with the Jordan curve theorem, the hairy ball theorem, the invariance of dimension and the Borsuk–Ulam theorem. This gives it a place among the fundamental theorems of topology.' back |
Claude Shannon (1949), Communication in the Presence of Noise, 'A method is developed for representing any communication system geometrically. Messages and the corresponding signals are points in two “function spaces,” and the modulation process is a mapping of one space into the other. Using this representation, a number of results in communication theory are deduced concerning expansion and compression of bandwidth and the threshold effect. Formulas are found for the maximum rate of transmission of binary digits over a system when the signal is perturbed by various types of noise. Some of the properties of “ideal” systems which transmit at this maximum rate are discussed. The equivalent number of binary digits per second for certain information sources is calculated.' [C. E. Shannon , “Communication in the presence of noise,” Proc. IRE,
vol. 37, pp. 10–21, Jan. 1949.] back |
Codec - Wikipedia, Codec - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, 'A codec is a device or computer program that encodes or decodes a data stream or signal. Codec is a portmanteau of coder/decoder. . . .
IA coder or encoder encodes a data stream or a signal for transmission or storage, possibly in encrypted form, and the decoder function reverses the encoding for playback or editing. Codecs are used in videoconferencing, streaming media, and video editing applications.
In the mid-20th century, a codec was a device that coded analog signals into digital form using pulse-code modulation (PCM). Later, the name was also applied to software for converting between digital signal formats, including companding functions. ' back |
Computer - Wikipedia, Computer - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, ' A computer is a machine that can be instructed to carry out sequences of arithmetic or logical operations automatically via computer programming. Modern computers have the ability to follow generalized sets of operations, called programs. These programs enable computers to perform an extremely wide range of tasks. A "complete" computer including the hardware, the operating system (main software), and peripheral equipment required and used for "full" operation can be referred to as a computer system.' back |
Cybernetics - Wikipedia, Cybernetics - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, ' Cybernetics is a transdisciplinary approach for exploring regulatory systems, their structures, constraints, and possibilities. Cybernetics is relevant to the study of systems, such as mechanical, physical, biological, cognitive, and social systems. Cybernetics is applicable when a system being analyzed is involved in a closed signaling loop; that is, where action by the system generates some change in its environment and that change is reflected in that system in some manner (feedback) that triggers a system change, originally referred to as a "circular causal" relationship.' back |
Davison E. Soper, Newton's reasoning for the orbit of the Moon , ' "I deduced that the forces which keep the Planets in their orbs must [be] reciprocally as the squares of their distances from the centers about which they revolve; and thereby compared the force requisite to keep the Moon in her orb with the force of gravity at the surface of the earth, and found them to answer pretty nearly".'
back |
Differentiable manifold - Wikipedia, Differentiable manifold - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, ' In mathematics, a differentiable manifold (also differential manifold) is a type of manifold that is locally similar enough to a vector space to allow one to apply calculus. Any manifold can be described by a collection of charts (atlas). One may then apply ideas from calculus while working within the individual charts, since each chart lies within a vector space to which the usual rules of calculus apply. If the charts are suitably compatible (namely, the transition from one chart to another is differentiable), then computations done in one chart are valid in any other differentiable chart. ' back |
Dirac equation - Wikipedia, Dirac equation - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, 'In particle physics, the Dirac equation is a relativistic wave equation derived by British physicist Paul Dirac in 1928. In its free form, or including electromagnetic interactions, it describes all spin-1⁄2 massive particles such as electrons and quarks, for which parity is a symmetry, and is consistent with both the principles of quantum mechanics and the theory of special relativity, and was the first theory to account fully for special relativity in the context of quantum mechanics. It accounted for the fine details of the hydrogen spectrum in a completely rigorous way.' back |
Dynamics - Wikipedia, Dynamics - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, ' Dynamics is the branch of classical mechanics that is concerned with the study of forces and their effects on motion. Isaac Newton was the first to formulate the fundamental physical laws that govern dynamics in classical non-relativistic physics, especially his second law of motion. ' back |
Equivalence principle - Wikipedia, Equivalence principle - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, ' In the physics of general relativity, the equivalence principle is any of several related concepts dealing with the equivalence of gravitational and inertial mass, and to Albert Einstein's assertion that the gravitational "force" as experienced locally while standing on a massive body (such as the Earth) is actually the same as the pseudo-force experienced by an observer in a non-inertial (accelerated) frame of reference.' back |
Fabio Pacucci et al, JWST CEERS and JADES Active Galaxies at z = 4–7 Violate the Local M•–Må Relation at >3σ: Implications for Low-mass Black Holes and Seeding Models, ' JWST is revolutionizing our understanding of the high-z Universe by expanding the black hole horizon, looking farther and to smaller masses, and revealing the stellar light of their hosts. By examining JWST galaxies at z = 4–7 that host Hα-detected black holes, we investigate (i) the high-z M•–Må relation and (ii) the black hole mass
distribution, especially in its low-mass range (M• 10 6.5 Me). With a detailed statistical analysis, our findings conclusively reveal a high-z M• –Må relation that deviates at >3σ confidence level from the local relation. . . .
Current JWST fields represent a treasure trove of black hole systems at z = 4–7; their detection will provide crucial insights into their early evolution and coevolution with their galactic hosts.' back |
Feather - Wikipedia, Feather - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, ' Feathers are epidermal growths that form a distinctive outer covering, or plumage, on both avian (bird) and some non-avian dinosaurs and other archosaurs. They are the most complex integumentary structures found in vertebrates and a premier example of a complex evolutionary novelty. They are among the characteristics that distinguish the extant birds from other living groups.' back |
Gauge theory - Wikipedia, Gauge theory - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, ' In physics, a gauge theory is a type of field theory in which the Lagrangian does not change (is invariant) under local transformations from certain Lie groups.
The term gauge refers to any specific mathematical formalism to regulate redundant degrees of freedom in the Lagrangian. The transformations between possible gauges, called gauge transformations, form a Lie group—referred to as the symmetry group or the gauge group of the theory. Associated with any Lie group is the Lie algebra of group generators. For each group generator there necessarily arises a corresponding field (usually a vector field) called the gauge field. Gauge fields are included in the Lagrangian to ensure its invariance under the local group transformations (called gauge invariance). When such a theory is quantized, the quanta of the gauge fields are called gauge bosons. If the symmetry group is non-commutative, then the gauge theory is referred to as non-abelian gauge theory, the usual example being the Yang–Mills theory.' back |
Geodesics in general relativity - Wikipedia, Geodesics in general relativity - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, ' In general relativity, a geodesic generalizes the notion of a "straight line" to curved spacetime. Importantly, the world line of a particle free from all external, non-gravitational force, is a particular type of geodesic. In other words, a freely moving or falling particle always moves along a geodesic.' back |
Gravitational constant - Wikipedia, Gravitational constant - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, 'The gravitational constant denoted by letter G, is an empirical physical constant involved in the calculation(s) of gravitational force between two bodies.' back |
Hamiltonian mechanics - Wikipedia, Hamiltonian mechanics - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, ' Hamiltonian mechanics is a mathematically sophisticated formulation of classical mechanics. Historically, it contributed to the formulation of statistical mechanics and quantum mechanics. Hamiltonian mechanics was first formulated by William Rowan Hamilton in 1833, starting from Lagrangian mechanics, a previous reformulation of classical mechanics introduced by Joseph Louis Lagrange in 1788. Like Lagrangian mechanics, Hamiltonian mechanics is equivalent to Newton's laws of motion in the framework of classical mechanics.' back |
Harvard & Smthsonian Center for Astrophysics, Unexpectedly Massive Black Holes Dominate Small Galaxies in the Distant Universe , ' New Orleans, LA – Astronomers have discovered that the supermassive black holes in the centers of early galaxies are much more massive than expected. These surprisingly hefty black holes offer new insights into the origins of all supermassive black holes, as well as the earliest stages of their host galaxy's lives.
In nearby, mature galaxies like our Milky Way, the total mass of stars vastly outweighs the mass of the big black hole found at the galaxy's center by about 1000 to 1. In the newfound distant galaxies, however, that mass difference drops to 100 or 10 to 1, and even to 1 to 1, meaning the black hole can equal the combined mass of its host galaxy's stars.' back |
Hilbert's program - Wikipedia, Hilbert's program - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, ' In mathematics, Hilbert's program, formulated by German mathematician David Hilbert, was a proposed solution to the foundational crisis of mathematics, when early attempts to clarify the foundations of mathematics were found to suffer from paradoxes and inconsistencies. As a solution, Hilbert proposed to ground all existing theories to a finite, complete set of axioms, and provide a proof that these axioms were consistent. Hilbert proposed that the consistency of more complicated systems, such as real analysis, could be proven in terms of simpler systems. Ultimately, the consistency of all of mathematics could be reduced to basic arithmetic.' back |
Isaac Newton (1726), General Scholium, 'Published for the first time as an appendix to the 2nd (1713) edition of the Principia, the General Scholium reappeared in the 3rd (1726) edition with some amendments and additions. As well as countering the natural philosophy of Leibniz and the Cartesians, the General Scholium contains an excursion into natural theology and theology proper. In this short text, Newton articulates the design argument (which he fervently believed was furthered by the contents of his Principia), but also includes an oblique argument for a unitarian conception of God and an implicit attack on the doctrine of the Trinity, which Newton saw as a post-biblical corruption. The English translation here is that of Andrew Motte (1729). Italics and orthography as in original. back |
John von Neumann (2014), Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, ' Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics by John von Neumann translated from the German by Robert T. Beyer (New Edition) edited by Nicholas A. Wheeler. Princeton UP Princeton & Oxford.
Preface: ' This book is the realization of my long-held intention to someday use the resources of TEX to produce a more easily read version of Robert T. Beyer’s authorized English translation (Princeton University Press, 1955) of John von Neumann’s classic Mathematische Grundlagen der Quantenmechanik (Springer, 1932).'This content downloaded from 129.127.145.240 on Sat, 30 May 2020 22:38:31 UTC
back |
Kerson Huang (2013), A Critical History of Renormalization, ' The history of renormalization is reviewed with a critical eye,starting with Lorentz's theory of radiation damping, through perturbative QED with Dyson, Gell‐Mann & Low, and others, to Wilson's formulation and Polchinski's functional equation, and applications to "triviality", and dark energy in cosmology.
Dedication: Renormalization, that astounding mathematical trick that enabled one to tame divergences in Feynman diagrams, led to the triumph of quantum electrodynamics. Ken Wilson made it physics, by uncovering its deep connection with scale transformations. The idea that scale determines the perception of
world seems obvious. When one examines an oil painting, for example, what one sees depends on the resolution of the instrument one uses for the examination. At resolutions of the naked eye, one sees art, perhaps, but upon greater and greater magnifications, one sees pigments, then molecules and atoms, and so forth. What is non‐trivial is to formulate this mathematically, as a physical theory, and this is what Ken Wilson had achieved.' back |
Kinematics - Wikipedia, Kinematics - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, 'Kinematics (from Greek . . . kinein, to move) is a subfield of physics, developed in classical mechanics, that describes the motion of points, bodies (objects), and systems of bodies (groups of objects) without considering the forces that cause them to move.' back |
Lorentz transformation - Wikipedia, Lorentz transformation - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, 'In physics, the Lorentz transformation or Lorentz-Fitzgerald transformation describes how, according to the theory of special relativity, two observers' varying measurements of space and time can be converted into each other's frames of reference. It is named after the Dutch physicist Hendrik Lorentz. It reflects the surprising fact that observers moving at different velocities may measure different distances, elapsed times, and even different orderings of events.' back |
Martinus J G Veltman (1999), Nobel Lecture 1999: From weak interactions to gravitation, ' This lecture is about my contribution to the renormalizability of gauge theories. There is of course no perfectly clear separation between my contributions and those of my co-laureate 't Hooft, but I will limit mysef to some brief comments on those publications that carry only his name. An extensive review on the subject including detailed references to contemporary work can be found elsewhere.
As is well known, the work on renormalizability of gauge theories caused a complete change in the landscape of particle physics.' back |
Meinard Kuhlmann (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy), Quantum Field Theory, ' Quantum Field Theory (QFT) is the mathematical and conceptual framework for contemporary elementary particle physics. In a rather informal sense QFT is the extension of quantum mechanics (QM), dealing with particles, over to fields, i.e. systems with an infinite number of degrees of freedom. (See the entry on quantum mechanics.) In the last few years QFT has become a more widely discussed topic in philosophy of science, with questions ranging from methodology and semantics to ontology. QFT taken seriously in its metaphysical implications seems to give a picture of the world which is at variance with central classical conceptions of particles and fields, and even with some features of QM.' back |
Newton's law of universal gravitation - Wikipedia, Newton's law of universal gravitation - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, ' Newton's law of universal gravitation is usually stated as that every particle attracts every other particle in the universe with a force that is directly proportional to the product of their masses and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between their centers. The publication of the theory has become known as the "first great unification", as it marked the unification of the previously described phenomena of gravity on Earth with known astronomical behaviors.' back |
P. A. M. Dirac (1933), The Lagrangian in Quantum Mechanics, ' . . . there is an alternative formulation [to the Hamiltonian] in classical dynamics, provided by the Lagrangian. This requires one to work in terms of coordinates and velocities instead of coordinates and momenta. The two formulation are closely related but there are reasons for believing that the Lagrangian one is more fundamental. . . . Secondly the lagrangian method can easily be expressed relativistically, on account of the action function being a relativistic invariant; . . .. ' [This article was first published in Physikalische Zeitschrift der Sowjetunion, Band 3, Heft 1 (1933), pp. 64–72.] back |
Photon - Wikipedia, Photon - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, ' A photon (from Ancient Greek φῶς, φωτός (phôs, phōtós) 'light') is an elementary particle that is a quantum of the electromagnetic field, including electromagnetic radiation such as light and radio waves, and the force carrier for the electromagnetic force. Photons are massless, so they always move at the speed of light in vacuum, 299792458 m/s . . .. The photon belongs to the class of bosons.' back |
Planck scale - Wikipedia, Planck scale - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, In particle physics and physical cosmology, the Planck scale is an energy scale around GeV (corresponding to the Planck mass) at which quantum effects of gravity become strong. At this scale, the description of sub-atomic particle interactions in terms of quantum field theory breaks down (due to the non-renormalizability of gravity). That is; although physicists have a fairly good understanding of the other fundamental interactions or forces on the quantum level, gravity is problematic, and cannot be integrated with quantum mechanics (at high energies) using the usual framework of quantum field theory. . . . ' back |
Qubit - Wikipedia, Qubit - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, 'A quantum bit, or qubit . . . is a unit of quantum information. That information is described by a state vector in a two-level quantum mechanical system which is formally equivalent to a two-dimensional vector space over the complex numbers.
Benjamin Schumacher discovered a way of interpreting quantum states as information. He came up with a way of compressing the information in a state, and storing the information on a smaller number of states. This is now known as Schumacher compression. In the acknowledgments of his paper (Phys. Rev. A 51, 2738), Schumacher states that the term qubit was invented in jest, during his conversations with Bill Wootters.' back |
Renormalization group - Wikipedia, Renormalization group - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, ' In theoretical physics, renormalization group (RG) refers to a mathematical apparatus that allows one to investigate the changes of a physical system as one views it at different distance scales. In particle physics it reflects the changes in the underlying force laws as one varies the energy scale at which physical processes occur. A change in scale is called a "scale transformation" or "conformal transformation." The renormalization group is intimately related to "conformal invariance" or "scale invariance," a symmetry by which the system appears the same at all scales (so-called self-similarity).' back |
Richard P. Feynman (1965), Nobel Lecture: The Development of the Space-Time View of Quantum Electrodynamics, Nobel Lecture, December 11, 1965: I did gather from my readings, however, that two things were the source of the difficulties with the quantum electrodynamical theories. The first was an infinite energy of interaction of the electron with itself. And this difficulty existed even in the classical theory. The other difficulty came from some infinites which had to do with the infinite numbers of degrees of freedom in the field. As I understood it at the time (as nearly as I can remember) this was simply the difficulty that if you quantized the harmonic oscillators of the field (say in a box) each oscillator has a ground state energy of (½hω) and there is an infinite number of modes in a box of every increasing frequency ω, and therefore there is an infinite energy in the box. I now realize that that wasn’t a completely correct statement of the central problem; it can be removed simply by changing the zero from which energy is measured. At any rate, I believed that the difficulty arose somehow from a combination of the electron acting on itself and the infinite number of degrees of freedom of the field.' back |
Rolf Landauer (1999), Information is a Physical Entity, 'Abstract: This paper, associated with a broader conference talk on the fundamental physical limits of information handling, emphasizes the aspects still least appreciated. Information is not an abstract entity but exists only through a physical representation, thus tying it to all the restrictions and possibilities of our real physical universe. The mathematician's vision of an unlimited sequence of totally reliable operations is unlikely to be implementable in this real universe. Speculative remarks about the possible impact of that on the ultimate nature of the laws of physics are included.' back |
Standard model - Wikipedia, Standard model - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, 'The Standard Model of particle physics is a theory that describes three of the four known fundamental interactions between the elementary particles that make up all matter. It is a quantum field theory developed between 1970 and 1973 which is consistent with both quantum mechanics and special relativity. To date, almost all experimental tests of the three forces described by the Standard Model have agreed with its predictions. However, the Standard Model falls short of being a complete theory of fundamental interactions, primarily because of its lack of inclusion of gravity, the fourth known fundamental interaction, but also because of the large number of numerical parameters (such as masses and coupling constants) that must be put "by hand" into the theory (rather than being derived from first principles) . . . ' back |
Stephen Hawking (2002), What's the Total Energy In the Universe?, ' Stephen Hawking explains the concept of negative energy in his book The Theory of Everything (New Millennium 2002): "Two pieces of matter that are close to each other have less [positive] energy than the same two pieces a long way apart, because you have to expend energy to separate them against the gravitational force that is pulling them together," . . .
Since it takes positive energy to separate the two pieces of matter, gravity must be using negative energy to pull them together. Thus, "the gravitational field has negative energy. In the case of a universe that is approximately uniform in space, one can show that this negative gravitational energy exactly cancels the positive energy represented by the matter. So the total energy of the universe is zero".' back |
String theory - Wikipedia, String theory - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, 'In physics, string theory is a theoretical framework in which the point-like particles of particle physics are replaced by one-dimensional objects called strings. String theory describes how these strings propagate through space and interact with each other. On distance scales larger than the string scale, a string looks just like an ordinary particle, with its mass, charge, and other properties determined by the vibrational state of the string. In string theory, one of the many vibrational states of the string corresponds to the graviton, a quantum mechanical particle that carries gravitational force. Thus string theory is a theory of quantum gravity. ' back |
Supersymmetry - Wikipedia, Supersymmetry - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, ' In a supersymmetric theory the equations for force and the equations for matter are identical. In theoretical and mathematical physics, any theory with this property has the principle of supersymmetry (SUSY). Dozens of supersymmetric theories exist. Supersymmetry is a spacetime symmetry between two basic classes of particles: bosons, which have an integer-valued spin and follow Bose–Einstein statistics, and fermions, which have a half-integer-valued spin and follow Fermi-Dirac statistics. In supersymmetry, each particle from one class would have an associated particle in the other, known as its superpartner, the spin of which differs by a half-integer.' back |
Tower of Babel - Wikipedia, Tower of Babel - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, 'The Tower of Babel . . . is a Near Eastern account recorded in the Book of Genesis. It is meant to explain why the world's peoples speak different languages. According to the story, a united humanity . . . agree to build a city and a tower tall enough to reach heaven. God, observing their city and tower, confounds their speech so that they can no longer understand each other, and scatters them around the world.' back |
Unmoved mover - Wikipedia, Unmoved mover - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, ' The unmoved mover (Ancient Greek: ὃ οὐ κινούμενον κινεῖ, lit. 'that which moves without being moved' or prime mover (Latin: primum movens) is a concept advanced by Aristotle as a primary cause (or first uncaused cause) or "mover" of all the motion in the universe. As is implicit in the name, the unmoved mover moves other things, but is not itself moved by any prior action. In Book 12 (Greek: Λ) of his Metaphysics, Aristotle describes the unmoved mover as being perfectly beautiful, indivisible, and contemplating only the perfect contemplation: self-contemplation. He equates this concept also with the active intellect. This Aristotelian concept had its roots in cosmological speculations of the earliest Greek pre-Socratic philosophers and became highly influential and widely drawn upon in medieval philosophy and theology. St. Thomas Aquinas, for example, elaborated on the unmoved mover in the Quinque viae. ' back |
Zero-energy universe - Wikipedia, Zero-energy universe - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, 'The zero-energy universe hypothesis proposes that the total amount of energy in the universe is exactly zero: its amount of positive energy in the form of matter is exactly cancelled out by its negative energy in the form of gravity. . . . The zero-energy universe theory originated in 1973, when Edward Tryon proposed in the journal Nature that the universe emerged from a large-scale quantum fluctuation of vacuum energy, resulting in its positive mass-energy being exactly balanced by its negative gravitational potential energy.' back |
|